Re: UCR/GCR revisited
Re: UCR/GCR revisited
- Subject: Re: UCR/GCR revisited
- From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:24:15 -0700
- Thread-topic: UCR/GCR revisited
In a message dated 6/10/08 1:59 AM, Koch Karl wrote:
> Of course, all of the above concerns are superfluous (graem is right
> here!), provided that and only if! the press works stable and
> according to a (any) standard, the contract proof matches exactly this
> standard, the press check is done under standard lighting and the
> customer is sensible enough to accept the result that looks like the
> proof and doesn´t want last minute changes during the press run ;-)
Hi Karl.
Yes, agreed. Clients will do that, sometimes.
> Let me make it clear: I´m all against retouching on press!
> But then, when all these provisions are being met, we won´t have to
> bother about the black any more. Then we can use max black and save
> ink. Colorful images remain colorful, even with max black, if the
> profiler works correctly.
I look forward to more printing companies getting smarter to these
advantages. On the other hand, it means a lot of change for them in the way
they used to operating. It will take time.
Marco Ugolini
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden