• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: UCR/GCR revisited
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: UCR/GCR revisited


  • Subject: Re: UCR/GCR revisited
  • From: Koch Karl <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:59:12 +0200


Am 10.06.2008 um 00:05 schrieb Marco Ugolini:


But, on the other hand, using different black generation policies for images
on a single signature may have the *positive* effect of preserving the
integrity of images in that signature that we want to *protect* against
possible color shifts on press, while allowing other less critical ones to
shift as they may.


For example, if you have some images on an individual signature that are in
full color and others that also use all 4 inks but are meant to look
neutral, you may want to separate the latter using a stronger black
generation (not "Max K" necessarily) to provide added protection against
loss of neutrality, whereas the former can still be separated with a lower
black component.

Hi Marco,

I agree with this, with one exception (again these exceptions):
The pressman needs to be aware of these mixed Light/Heavy K (separated) images (to use Harolds wording, which definitely is more correct than the UCR/GCR and especially UCA stuff). Light K images will overly react on corrections in the color ink keys, while heavy K images will overly react on corrections in the black ink keys.
Of course, all of the above concerns are superfluous (graem is right here!), provided that – and only if! – the press works stable and according to a (any) standard, the contract proof matches exactly this standard, the press check is done under standard lighting – and the customer is sensible enough to accept the result that looks like the proof and doesn´t want last minute changes during the press run ;-)
Let me make it clear: I´m all against retouching on press!
But then, when all these provisions are being met, we won´t have to bother about the black any more. Then we can use max black and save ink. Colorful images remain colorful, even with max black, if the profiler works correctly.


Regards,

Karl _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: UCR/GCR revisited
      • From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
    • Re: UCR/GCR revisited
      • From: Terry Walker <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: UCR/GCR revisited (From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: UCR/GCR revisited
  • Next by Date: Re: UCR/GCR revisited
  • Previous by thread: Re: UCR/GCR revisited
  • Next by thread: Re: UCR/GCR revisited
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread