• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
GCR and ink savings (was Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 209)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

GCR and ink savings (was Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 209)


  • Subject: GCR and ink savings (was Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 209)
  • From: Terence Wyse <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 08:43:43 -0400


On Jun 15, 2008, at 3:09 PM, Brian Lawler wrote:

Regarding Roger's comments...

Why would switching from AM to FM result in an ink savings?


It does Brian but I've no good explanation for it.

I can think of one possible explanation for it in the case of the device link profiles I've created for pressrooms. In the device links I've created for AM screening, I will generally not start the K below about 15-25% to avoid "peppering" or K dots in lighter colors but with FM screening I've started K as low as 5% with no ill effect. The result is more GCR and ink savings as a result of the longer K.




You're putting down the same dot area, and that would result in approximately the same amount of ink being put on the paper.

The only thing that changes is the formation of the tonal information: a clump of machine spots vs. a pseudo-random distribution of the same machine spots.

If you were to calculate the area of paper covered by ink per cell in an AM halftone and compare that the area covered by ink per cell with an FM screen, they should be the same, or very close, otherwise the image would be different.

I am eager to hear the explanation.

I hear ya Brian but all I can tell is that it's true. I've got testimonials from a couple of my customers that print both AM and FM using "ink saving" device links in the pressroom and they've all told me they save more ink using FM and device links.


The other FM "phenomena" is when doing a G7 press curves (no links, just plate curves). You can hit the same G7 "NPDC" curve by the numbers for both AM and FM but the two will still print completely different, especially from highlight to midtone. So there's something more going on with FM than meets the eye!

BTW, regarding your earlier post that basically stated that GCR doesn't save ink, you bet it does! I conservatively tell customers that they will save between 10-15% by using device links when making plates but the reality is it's closer to 25-35% in a lot of cases. Again, I've got testimonials from customers that did some careful testing.

Regards,
Terry Wyse

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: GCR and ink savings (was Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 209)
      • From: Henk Gianotten <email@hidden>
    • Re: GCR and ink savings (was Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 209)
      • From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 209 (From: Brian Lawler <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 209 - AM/FM screens
  • Next by Date: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 209 - AM/FM screens
  • Previous by thread: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 209 - AM/FM screens
  • Next by thread: Re: GCR and ink savings (was Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 209)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread