• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: camera colour spaces
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: camera colour spaces


  • Subject: Re: camera colour spaces
  • From: Karsten Krüger <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:10:07 +0100

While I did not read all postings to this thread...

Some time ago I went thru the whole process of profiling some cameras
(Minolta DiMAGE 7i, A1 und Canon EOS 20D) under several light conditions.


There were several observations:
- CCD-sensors are, basically speaking, light sensitive transistors with color
filters for red, blue and green. These filters match exactly one light condition
to 100%, all other light situations shift sensitivity for each color filter into
an other direction.


This is the reason why camera CCDs change their gamut under different light.
Never asume that a choosen profile works for every situation you are getting
into. And it is in no way a linear process, even when you change camera settings
according to the light. Sensitivity and gamut change with f-stops, apperture time
and illumination.


Due to these physical constrains there is no "one size fits all" solution.

- Video technology based cameras (mostly point & click) have more information
and time to adjust whitepoint, f-stop and apperture time because they have all
sensor data available before you actually take a shot.


DSLRs don't have this information. They use sensors like their analog parents,
do some guessing on what is happening in front of the lens and need a fast
processor to manage color once the picture is taken.


- Picture data is huge. If a camera does a lot of color management like Photoshop
it would be too slow for actual use. Color management inside of a camera has to
be fast and is limited to very simple math. But simple math is the opposite of
exact color in every situation. So every time a camera takes a JPEG or TIFF shot,
there is a lot of compromise involved and the output gamut (i.e. sRGB or AdobeRGB)
is more or less just one out of two image processing modes that more or less
match one or the other gamut but don't want to be exact at all.


The only one way to get full control on what happens to you image is to use RAW.

- When you profile a camera in a certain light setting, all light specific information
gets eliminated. While this is good when you take pictures of objects for a catalog,
it destroys the mood and feelings of a sunset or a sunny day, which is not desireable.


  So a custom camera profile does not work for every situation.

=> Camera gamuts are shifting, cameras do guesswork, don't have time to do
great color management and custom profiles don't work for all purposes.


For a consumer workflow with point & click cameras expectations are low. As
long as there is a decent output on a local inkjet printer (which usually tries to match
sRGB) there is no reason to go into details.


If you want a bit more, make a custom profile of your point & click camera, on a sunny
day, at about 10am and apply it to your pictures. This helps to eliminate blurry colors
or color shifts and does not eliminate too much of the sunset/sunny day feelings.


For a professional workflow the only way to gain control is to use RAW and a RAW
converter on a suitable, calibrated and profiled monitor. And, of course, understanding
color management.


While many people like Adobe's current products, ACR in my understanding currently
lacks some essential features:
- There is no way to use custom camera ICC profiles. While this may not be essential
for many applications, it reduces your flexibility and makes things complicated when
you need to use your own profiles.
- ACR only allows ProPhoto, sRGB and AdobeRGB as output color spaces. Modern
L-Star based gamuts like eciRGB v2 provide a better color workspace for post processing
and professional printing. And there is no way to directly output into CMYK, which is
an other possibility of loosing image details.


I prefere Capture One Pro because:
- you really can turn of color management to make camera profiles (Select "Embed camera
profile" and **NO** color conversion is done).
- You can select predefined and your own custom camera ICC profiles as camera gamut.
- You can output to any RGB or CMYK ICC profile including setting your rendering intend.
- If you happen to have an ICC profile of your printer (or perhaps use current offset standard
ISOcoated v2 when you want your pictures print in offset quality), Capture One reduces
your monitor to the colors of your printer and all your editing happens in a simulated
CMYK color space - no losses and extremely close to what you are getting out of your printer.
- You can apply the same settings on a whole set of images on the fly.
- You can output to several workflows at the same time (like sRGB lowres for web and
ISOcoated v2highres for print)


(the last two items really boost your productivity).

Just my 2 cents on this,
Karsten
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Re: camera colour spaces (From: "info" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: camera colour spaces (From: "edmund ronald" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: camera colour spaces
  • Next by Date: Re: camera colour spaces
  • Previous by thread: Re: camera colour spaces
  • Next by thread: Re: camera colour spaces
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread