Re: X-Rite ColorMunki review
Re: X-Rite ColorMunki review
- Subject: Re: X-Rite ColorMunki review
- From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:08:12 -0600
- Thread-topic: X-Rite ColorMunki review
On 3/18/08 9:58 AM, "email@hidden" wrote:
> I find the quick switch from "Your product doesn't measure enough patches" to
> "You don't need all those patches" to be rather interesting. We'll just keep
> on trying to produce enough product to meet our customer's demands.
You have a product that requires users to measure more than 100 patches, one
patch at a time to produce a fixed profile quality yes or no? If you want to
send me your product so I can test 100 colormunki patch profile next to
yours and report back, as I've said, you've got my address. I'd be happy to
do this and report here or elsewhere.
The fact of the matter today is, for roughly the same price point as your
one patch at a time device, I have a package that does more faster and, I'd
suspect better. We can prove this easily.
> Thats another change, Andrew. Its Datacolor.
Then Datacolor stands accused as did Color Vision!
Andrew Rodney
http://www.digitaldog.net/
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden