Re: unfavorable X-Rite ColorMunki experience
Re: unfavorable X-Rite ColorMunki experience
- Subject: Re: unfavorable X-Rite ColorMunki experience
- From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 18:42:29 -0600
- Thread-topic: unfavorable X-Rite ColorMunki experience
On 5/8/08 6:24 PM, "Robert Krawitz" wrote:
> Kodachrome vs. Velvia is essentially a matter of deliberately choosing
> different settings. Beyond that, the fact that process control was
> not good in the analog days isn't a good excuse for it not being bad
> now -- unless the de facto requirement has looser tolerances than what
> people here claim to be the case.
Let's separate what is different from what's problematic, or as you say
"bad". If anyone thinks that some magic profile, or ICC technology will take
a Raw, scene referred data and make all Raw processors product the same
color appearance, my question would be, what's the use of that? And why
would any manufacturer or software vendor be willing to see that?
If you take 5 ink jet printers from various manufactures, profile them using
the current ICC technology, do you expect all the prints from the same
numbers will appear identically? I don't, nor do I think it would be useful
to the end user.
My main question to Edmund is, what's the problem he sees that requires a
solution? Or is this a solution is search of a problem?
Andrew Rodney
http://www.digitaldog.net/
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden