• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: unfavorable X-Rite ColorMunki experience
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: unfavorable X-Rite ColorMunki experience


  • Subject: Re: unfavorable X-Rite ColorMunki experience
  • From: Robert Krawitz <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 20:24:58 -0400

   Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 08:42:04 -0600
   From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>

   On 5/8/08 8:22 AM, "edmund ronald"  wrote:

   > I am now incapable of being *certain* of getting color-reliable prints
   > from any Mac machine I own, when printing from Photoshop, as various
   > system bugs, app bugs and printer driver bugs and sundry updates
   > collide and interact from version to version.

   Isn't that what Tom is hoping to accomplish based on his last post? Its
   pretty clear there's a few print issues that need to be addressed.

Hopefully Gutenprint will be able to do the job :-)

   > As for camera color,
   > it's impossible to expect similar color from two different model
   > cameras.This is appalling.

   Its not appalling and its been something we've seen from day one in
   analog photography, the world didn't explode because Kodachrome
   didn't produce the exact color appearance as Velva nor could you be
   sure that two lens of the same manufacturer produced identical
   color on the same film, shooting the same scene (or that one batch
   of Agfachrome would match another). Or that two E6 labs would
   produce the same chrome shot side by side on two different
   cameras. Or that two printers of the same make produce identical
   color from the same set of RGB numbers run though two different
   manufactures ICC profiles!

Kodachrome vs. Velvia is essentially a matter of deliberately choosing
different settings.  Beyond that, the fact that process control was
not good in the analog days isn't a good excuse for it not being bad
now -- unless the de facto requirement has looser tolerances than what
people here claim to be the case.

--
Robert Krawitz                                     <email@hidden>

Tall Clubs International  --  http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2
Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail email@hidden
Project lead for Gutenprint   --    http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net

"Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works."
--Eric Crampton
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: unfavorable X-Rite ColorMunki experience
      • From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: unfavorable X-Rite ColorMunki experience (From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: The silence is deafening
  • Next by Date: Re: The silence is deafening
  • Previous by thread: Re: unfavorable X-Rite ColorMunki experience
  • Next by thread: Re: unfavorable X-Rite ColorMunki experience
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread