Re: unfavorable X-Rite ColorMunki experience
Re: unfavorable X-Rite ColorMunki experience
- Subject: Re: unfavorable X-Rite ColorMunki experience
- From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 21:27:08 -0400
Wow! That's encouraging news. So there is "light" at the end of this color
management tunnel after all.
Thank's Mark
Roger Breton
> You know, now that you mention this example, I have to tell you, when a
> well-known photographer here and I were doing tests at the time with the new
> Canon IPF5000 versus the Epson 4800 (or may have been the 4000 - I forget), I
> ran an image on my Epson, brought the print to his place, then we set-up the
> same file on his computer and ran it on the Canon. My set-up was Windows XP,
> Lacie 321, Epson printer. His set-up Apple Mac, Apple display, Canon printer.
> In terms of colours and luminosity you could hardly tell them apart. We did a
> couple more - same thing. I was really surprised. He wasn't - his comment was
> that if both our systems are properly colour-managed we should both get nearly
> identical results so what happened is what should have happened. Speaks well
> for where colour management has reached - at least in respect of inkjet
> printing from Photoshop files. .
>
> Mark
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden