Re: unfavorable X-Rite ColorMunki experience
Re: unfavorable X-Rite ColorMunki experience
- Subject: Re: unfavorable X-Rite ColorMunki experience
- From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 08:32:09 -0600
- Thread-topic: unfavorable X-Rite ColorMunki experience
On 5/9/08 8:22 AM, "Todd Shirley" wrote:
> How would this NOT be useful to the end user?
In terms of Raw?
In terms of a printer, that would only be useful and possible if they all
pretty much produced the same gamut and quality of prints. At least with my
testing, I see differences which make evaluating the units useful. I'm not
suggesting we don't profile them all, load the same paper and then print the
same images to test the qualities of each. I'm saying doing this doesn't
produce identical results because of the differences in say how a Canon and
an Epson print.
For Raw, I want to select the product that produces the best rendering
possible, I don't want, and I don't expect some ICC profile will make
Bibble, Aperture and ACR produce identical results. No more than I expect 3
different E6 films to be the same.
Andrew Rodney
http://www.digitaldog.net/
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden