Re: unfavorable X-Rite ColorMunki experience
Re: unfavorable X-Rite ColorMunki experience
- Subject: Re: unfavorable X-Rite ColorMunki experience
- From: "Mark Segal" <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 10:33:21 -0400
Yes. Unless I got it wrong, I thought one purpose of ICC-based colour management is to achieve cross-platform, cross-application and cross-device colour consistency. Hence some folks must have thought the purpose useful. Whether it happens or not is another matter, and we have evidence that it does and it doesn't, but I don't think that affects the intent.
Mark
----- Original Message -----
From: Todd Shirley
To: 'colorsync-users?lists.apple.com' List
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: unfavorable X-Rite ColorMunki experience
On May 8, 2008, at 8:42 PM, Andrew Rodney wrote:
> If you take 5 ink jet printers from various manufactures, profile
> them using
> the current ICC technology, do you expect all the prints from the same
> numbers will appear identically? I don't, nor do I think it would be
> useful
> to the end user.
How would this NOT be useful to the end user? I know lots of people
who would love it if things worked this way. Obviously it DOESN'T
usually work this way, but as Mark Segal has been saying, it is
certainly possible. In the cases where I've seen it work, I can say
that all parties involved were quite pleased and no one thought it was
"not useful".
-Todd Shirley
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden