• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Profiling Packages
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Profiling Packages


  • Subject: Re: Profiling Packages
  • From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 15:14:56 -0700 (GMT-07:00)

Mark Rice wrote:

>I have been using PhotoPrint6 on two wide format printers,
>creating profiles in it, and I get superior color output
>to other packages I have tried. I get better results than
>using Profilemaker Pro.

Randy Zaucha replied:

>I'm curious about how you consider the results of this
>profiling package better than others? Objective and/or subjective?

Randy's point is well-taken. I find it next to useless when I hear opinions that do not state some kind of objectively verifiable fact.

"Better results" is a very vague statement. Without hearing *what* is better and how other individuals can verify that for themselves, I am not at all made eager to look into what this other profiling package can do for me.

Marco Ugolini
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Prev by Date: Objective or subjective
  • Next by Date: Re: basICColor_Testimages_2007
  • Previous by thread: Objective or subjective
  • Next by thread: RE: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 183
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread