• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
RE: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?


  • Subject: RE: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?
  • From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 13:41:54 -0500

All pressroom operators I spoke to hold different opinions on when best to
calibrate. Some argue that it's best to do so under "normal" wear and tear
whereas others argue that it's best to do so right after the press has
undergone an annual kind of maintenance, bearers have been adjusted and so
on. The whole purpose of calibration is not to look good on a certificate to
IDEAlliance or ISO, that would be futile,  but to establish a workable
baseline of quality expectation for the pressroom to hold over time. That,
to me, is sensible. But I realize it is getting closer into pressroom
policies and some companies rather loose pressroom policies and like to keep
it that way. So back to industrial organization and management 101.

Regards/ Roger

> Several times I have read that the pressroom had the opinion that the
> press should be in its average state while another member of the team
> said that the press should be in its best printing state for
> "calibration".
>
> It seems to me that this dilemma is self-solving.  Is the purpose of
> the "calibration" for certification, or is the "calibration" for the
> purpose of running real jobs?  The pressroom understands that the
> press operates at non-optimum conditions for the majority of time.
>
> If G7 "calibration" is to be performed under optimum conditions, then
> the best explanation to the press room is that:
>
> a.  You expect the press to always be running in optimum condition
>
> OR
>
> b.  That this calibration is only for passing a test.
>
>
> I suspect that there may be some odd looks in response to "a".
>
>
> Henry Davis


__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 3578 (20081103) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • RE: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?
      • From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
References: 
 >RE: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average? (From: Henry <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?
  • Next by Date: RE: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?
  • Previous by thread: Re: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?
  • Next by thread: RE: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread