• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?


  • Subject: Re: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?
  • From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 10:52:30 -0800
  • Thread-topic: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?

In a message dated 11/4/08 7:00 AM, Mike Eddington wrote:

> I would also make a point that performing press maintenance doesn't
> necessarily equate returning the device to a repeatable state.

But what would be the use of doing that within a G7 framework? Without
stability, the G7 conditions are lost. If that is seen as an OK thing to do
by the print provider, then they are also no longer honoring a commitment to
G7-compliant output results.

Fine by me if it's fine by them. As long as they don't pretend to be what
they're not. Or I'll call them on it, if they work for my client.

Marco Ugolini


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Re: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average? (From: Mike Eddington <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Adobe Lightroom
  • Next by Date: Re: EIZO Color Edge CG241W off-axis problem?
  • Previous by thread: Re: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?
  • Next by thread: Re: G7 press calibration, best press conditions or average?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread