• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
RE: Photography editing spaces
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Photography editing spaces


  • Subject: RE: Photography editing spaces
  • From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 06:44:29 -0400

Matt,

I'd be curious to see how far these Nikons can reach into saturated colors
to begin with. Assuming a RAW workflow. But, if as you pointed out, in your
case, the images arrived at your doorstep already rendered to sRGB, either
off the camera's own internals or through ACR, which is a possibility, there
is no point then insisting on changing the encoding of the image to AdobeRGB
or some other larger color space to suit a higher calling. In general,
outside of fine arts reproduction or some other supposedly very high-end
workflow (PhaseOne and the like), sRGB is quite all right -- hate to sound
like a broken record. Marco's point about editing color is well taken. If
the color can't be seen on screen to begin with, because of its inherent
gamult limitation, how is a user to make decisions about it? In CMYK, this
approach makes sense. And in fact, that was the way countless color
retouchers operated in the past -- and still do, for a large part, all they
look at are the screen percentages. But the same can't be said for, say
ProPhoto, for instance. Can it?

Roger

> All kidding aside I want to thank you all for the information which has
> been invaluable. I think sRGB was the best choice for these shots which
> were from a Nikon D80 and D100 and a Canon PowerShot S5-IS. All of
> which
> have sRGB as their native color space. The only images I have that are
> different that I could find in my archives were from Leaf backs shot by
> a local studio who used Colormatch RGB. Otherwise almost everything I
> have to pull from is sRGB.
> - --
>
> Matt Beals


__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 3499 (20081007) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Photography editing spaces (From: Matt Beals <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Photography editing spaces (From: "Fleisher, Ken" <email@hidden>)
 >RE: Photography editing spaces (From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Photography editing spaces (From: Matt Beals <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: On the use of wide-gamut RGB working spaces [was: Photography editing spaces]
  • Next by Date: RE: Photography editing spaces
  • Previous by thread: Re: Photography editing spaces
  • Next by thread: RE: Photography editing spaces
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread