Re: GaMapICC
Re: GaMapICC
- Subject: Re: GaMapICC
- From: "edmund ronald" <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:41:44 +0200
I passed around a comparison print of my own made with Klaus's script
at Photokina. Trained eyes other than mine (Klaus Karcher, Robin
Myers, Rolf Gierling if I remember rightly), and others, all noticed
some loss of definition in the details in some saturated reds on a
fly-on-tomato print.
Graeme has created a superbly flexible software tool for us, it's time
we help him make it better by providing him with feedback. Argyll now
needs exhaustive quality testing of the esthetic aspects by
domain-specialist users.
Edmund
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Klaus Karcher
<email@hidden> wrote:
> I guess it has less to do with the image specific part but with Argyll's
> gamut mapping in general.
>
> I know that gamut mapping always has a touch of alchemy and is often rather
> a matter of taste than objective science, but the loss of details I've
> noticed in some situations (e.g. in saturated reds and light cyans) seems
> overdone to me (I saw completely disappearing cirrostratus clouds).
>
> I wonder how others feel about it.
>
> Klaus
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden