• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Fwd: Monitor calibration best practices
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Fwd: Monitor calibration best practices


  • Subject: Fwd: Monitor calibration best practices
  • From: Cdtobie <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:00:01 -0400



From: Cdtobie <email@hidden>
Date: October 14, 2008 9:57:18 PM EDT
To: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
Subject: Re: Monitor calibration best practices


Actually not all LCDs do have brightness and contrast controls. Some have both, plus backlight, but many, including most laptops and all Apple LCDs have no brightness or contrast controls at all; only a backlight adjustment.

Brightness controls are traditionally used to adjust the blacks to avoid black clipping. A backlight control won't do that. Contrast controls were traditionally used to adjust whites to avoid white clipping; a backlight control won't really do that either. What it will do is adjust white luminance to a lower level, to better relate to low ambient or proofing light levels.

Since LCDs don't work like CRTs, simply assuring at the factory that they are set up to provide appropriate detail at the black and white ends makes such controls rather unnecessary. But that doesn't leave the tinkerers of the world much to tinker with...

C. D. Tobie
WW Product Technology Mngr.
Digital Imaging & Home Theater
DataColor.com
email@hidden

On Oct 14, 2008, at 9:21 PM, Roger Breton <email@hidden> wrote:

It may seem silly but I have to admit that I finally understand what is
meant by 'backlight' -- thank's CD.


Of course, all LCD monitors have Contrast/Crightness controls otherwise
dubbed "backlight" control on this List.


These Contrast/Brightness controls are not be considered as "true" separate
hardware Contrast/Brightness controls, the way we found them in the days of
CRTs but they nevertheless control, at the hardware level, just how much
light is being emitted (radiated) by the monitor.


Quantization now seems a little clearer in this context.

Please correct me if I am wrong but as long as one dims down the monitor
through the OSD's Brightness/Contrast controls, otherwise called the
"Backlight" in geek color management parlance, one is not losing discrete
brightness levels to quantization. Only when one is dimming one or any
combination of the three channels in the host computer video LUT, there are
quantization issues. Right?


That's why many regular contributors on this List advocate never changing
the white point control of an LCD monitor, right? For fear of introducing
quantization or loss of discrete brightness levels at the video LUT levels.


But suppose an LCD monitor with useful separate RGB controls. Then what?
I'll say *if* the white point adjustment can be controlled in hardware,
suppose from native 9000K down to 5000K or D50, then I think it is fair to
say that no quantization should ensue as a consequence. Other than the
slight quantization that would be introduced by calibrating the individual
channels to obtain a gray ramp (R=G=B=from 0 to 255) to the chosen white
point chromaticities (Little x/y). There I think it is unavoidable to have
some slight quantization being introduced as a consequence of calibrating
the grayscale from the monitor white down through the black point.


The only time that we should be freed from the specter of quantization is
when the grayscale calibration is carried inside the monitor LUT itself, as
with the Eizo's, the NEC's, the HP and the Quatto's, leaving the computer
video LUT untouched (linear).


Is that better?

Roger

Yes, of course I meant lowering the display's brightness using the
display's
own controls, separate from the LUT in the CPU's graphic card.

Marco


__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 3522 (20081014) __________


The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com


_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Prev by Date: RE: Monitor calibration best practices
  • Next by Date: Re: Monitor calibration best practices
  • Previous by thread: Re: Any of the Mac beta/alpha testers out there
  • Next by thread: LaCie 730
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread