Re: X-Rite colormunki
Re: X-Rite colormunki
- Subject: Re: X-Rite colormunki
- From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:55:58 -0600
On Oct 20, 2008, at 4:45 PM, Terence Wyse wrote:
Nobody I know (color management colleagues that do this for a
living) use one of these things for their OWN work although they
might be selling them to customers. They might be perfectly fine but
I remain skeptical.
For the intended market and price point, it does far better than fair
perfectly fine. Its quite excellent on the devices (mostly well
behaved Epson's) I tested. Nope, I'm not trading it in for my iSis.
But in some cases, we're seeing better quality here because this is if
I'm correct, the first mating of GMB and X-Rite color technology. I
see the benefits of the older Monaco color engine with the smarts of
UV detection and compensation we see in ProfileMaker Pro. There's the
new iterative technology to update an existing profile based on
samples you provide. Its a peek into what should be coming.
Andrew Rodney
http://www.digitaldog.net/
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden