Re: Spectros better than colorimeters for monitor profiling?
Re: Spectros better than colorimeters for monitor profiling?
- Subject: Re: Spectros better than colorimeters for monitor profiling?
- From: Richard Wagner <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:46:18 -0700
Karl,
Any word on whether / when BasICColor Display will support the HP
DreamColor Display? I haven't heard back...
Thanks,
--Rich Wagner
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:51:30 +0200, Koch Karl <email@hidden> wrote:
Hi Marco,
if you feed them peanuts, all you can expect is monkeys <g>
I don´t think there are "better" or "worse" technologies here, it´s a
question of implementation.
My experience is that a spectro with a 20 nm or even 10 nm resolution
is not sufficient. Equally insuffient is a colorimeter with the
"wrong" calibration matrix. And the matrix will always be off, if it´s
not tailored to the respective panel type (backlight, LCD filter
characteristics).
A 1nm or 2nm spectro is doubtlessly the "better" instrument if money
(and ease of use) is irrelevant.
I prefer a panel-optimized colorimeter over any of the "affordable"
spectros. That´s why basICColor display will have a colorimeter/panel
optimization in one of the next versions.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden