RE: SWOP Proof Certification, TRxxx Characterization Data
RE: SWOP Proof Certification, TRxxx Characterization Data
- Subject: RE: SWOP Proof Certification, TRxxx Characterization Data
- From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:15:06 -0400
Klaus,
I don't want to quote you out of context but, allow me to ask why "keeping a
system in such tight tolerances can be challenging"?
Do you mean keeping a proofer or some inkjet printer, like an HP Zseries, in
tight tolerances?
I tend to believe that, provided stable humidity and temperature control,
these "system" remain within surprisingly tight tolerances. That is my
experience. Well under 3 deltaEab over the course of year, measured daily.
But that may not be what you had in mind?
Roger
> I think a feasible rule of thumb is trying to stay within half of the
> ISO tolerances when evaluating one's own proofs to make sure that the
> recipient of the proof can confirm its validity in spite of
> inter-instrument differences -- but keeping a system in such tight
> tolerances can be challenging.
>
> Klaus
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 3561 (20081027) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden