Media Testing for maclife.de
Media Testing for maclife.de
- Subject: Media Testing for maclife.de
- From: Paul Foerts <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 22:23:21 +0200
On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 11:24:42 -0700 Chris Cox <email@hidden> wrote:
> I'm sorry, but I have to disagree.
>
> Ule has been completely unprofessional in his review and on this mailing
> list. He has shown a very strong bias, failed to check his facts, failed to
> match results made by other reviewers (then claim that those results are not
> possible), made several statements that were blatantly false, and produced a
> "review" that appears to have no value due to his constant mistakes.
Thanks to Uli we got finally informed about an interesting "profile editor"
from Adobe and pointed to several pages of good information (on the Adobe
website).
We have witnessed the lack of cooperation/information on the subject Uli was
researching (he got as far as we understand outdated/incomplete
software/information from Adobe)...
I hope you find the time to get in touch with him personally to sort things
out instead of trusting sources who did not read/analyse his reviews.
His findings are objective and unbiased. If there is something wrong with
the facts, please let us know. He did the research "his way" but following
scientific methods. He did not claim to know it all and did not ask to
believe him. He just presented his findings.
What can possibly be wrong/false with this?
Please point us to one of his "his constant mistakes".
We (and he probably too) are eager to learn how it should have been done...
> Yes, Andrew's tone is a bit aggravated - but that does seem understandable
> when confronted with someone claiming to produce a professional review and
> then showing serious problems with every statement they make.
I do not understand why you are "defending" someone who deserved the tar and
feathers treatment for his uncontrolled "outburst".
Some apologies would have sounded more appropriate.
> I remained silent because I could not decide whether Ule was deliberately
> misleading in his review and arguments, too biased to see his mistakes, or
> just poorly informed on the topic of which he was writing. In the end, his
> motivation may not matter - but his mistakes should not be taken as fact.
I hope you will soon discover the other side of the truth.
> I really don't want to step into this mess, but the level of FUD is getting
> out of control and someone needs to get things back on track.
>
> Chris
Well this mess has been created by the man in feathers...
Or was it an "authority" thing?
Paul Foerts
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden