Re: Can DeviceLink conversions be better? was: Can this be done?
Re: Can DeviceLink conversions be better? was: Can this be done?
- Subject: Re: Can DeviceLink conversions be better? was: Can this be done?
- From: Steve Upton <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 16:16:42 -0700
At 12:26 AM -0700 9/6/08, Marco Ugolini wrote:
>In a message dated 9/1/08 5:02 PM, Iliah Borg wrote:
>
>> Dear Marco,
>>
>> ColorThink Pro is capable of generating device link profiles, though
>> the quality might be not as good as with DeviL.
>
>I know, Iliah. I have tried that function in ColorThink Pro, and the device
>links do not seem nearly as good (no offense to Steve and Chromix).
None taken.
The device links in ColorThink Pro are basic (as in base-level) 'encapsulated' color transforms that are built from a good-quality CMM. When you need a device link so you can get around a stupid RIP's CMM then they are great for the job.
They don't do the extra gamut mapping / inking tricks that are possible in more advanced device linking tools. So it's not a surprise that you see a difference.
regards,
Steve
--
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden