Re: Media Testing for maclife.de
Re: Media Testing for maclife.de
- Subject: Re: Media Testing for maclife.de
- From: "edmund ronald" <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 11:41:32 +0200
If you use an inkjet you only have the ink spectra to play with anyway -
My feeling is that what realy makes or breaks camera color is the
response of the Bayer CFA in the camera - which is clearly out of the
hands of Adobe or anyone else. If the CFA is badly matched to human
vision or has spikes then a calibration may work on a target but that
camera will make its users unhappy. Has happened.
If the CFA matched (is that possible ?) then calibration with almost
any patches would be trivial.
Edmund
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 1:44 AM, Eric Chan <email@hidden> wrote:
>> Measurement data are not from the CC24, though, but from the
>> Digital ColorChecker SG, which provides many more color patches
>> and therefore, more information
>
> That is fine, but be careful. There is not as much "information" as you might expect, because there are many dependencies among the patches of the SG or DC charts, unlike the CC24, for which the spectra were chosen very carefully.
>
> (I could print my own gazillion-patch target with my Epson 3800 but at most a few of the printed patches would be useful.)
>
> Eric
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden