Re: Media Testing for maclife.de
Re: Media Testing for maclife.de
- Subject: Re: Media Testing for maclife.de
- From: "Bob Frost" <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 11:18:49 +0100
Edmund,
If the CFA is badly matched to human
vision or has spikes then a calibration may work on a target but that
camera will make its users unhappy. Has happened.
If the CFA matched (is that possible ?) then calibration with almost
any patches would be trivial.
I may be showing my ignorance here, so am I wrong, or are the words
'calibration' and 'profiling' wrongly being used interchangeably in much of
this discussion?
I always understood, but am subject to correction, that they are two
entirely separate processes. When I run iMatch, or BasicColor, or
ColorNavigator on my monitors, it is my understanding that they first
'calibrate' the graphics card or monitor hardware, and then 'profile' the
resulting color, although I can opt to do just the latter, with no
'calibration'.
What I don't fully understand is the 'calibration' of a camera.
Uli's work seems to be just concerned with 'profiling', not 'calibration'?
Bob Frost.
----- Original Message -----
From: "edmund ronald" <email@hidden>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden