• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Media Testing for maclife.de
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Media Testing for maclife.de


  • Subject: Re: Media Testing for maclife.de
  • From: Uli Zappe <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:43:58 +0200

Am 11.09.2008 um 12:18 schrieb Bob Frost:

I always understood, but am subject to correction, that they are two entirely separate processes.

Yes. Simply put, "calibration" puts the hardware into a well-defined, optimum state. "Profiling" generates a profile that describes this very state (as far as color is concerned) and its limitations.


Therefore it is crucial to calibrate a hardware device before profiling it.

When I run iMatch, or BasicColor, or ColorNavigator on my monitors, it is my understanding that they first 'calibrate' the graphics card or monitor hardware, and then 'profile' the resulting color, although I can opt to do just the latter, with no 'calibration'.

Yep, since usually monitors don't have the means to calibrate themselves, monitor profiling packages offer calibration, too.


Printers and scanners, OTOH, usually auto-calibrate when you turn them on, or after a certain amount of usage time. Therefore, you won't see printer or scanner profiling software offer a calibration.

There's a simple but crucial difference between the effects of calibration and profiling. Since calibration changes *hardware* settings, it affects *all* software using this device, color managed or not. For instance, changing the gamma value or white balance of a monitor (which is done during calibration) affects the visual output of any software, color managed or not.

OTOH, profiling this monitor will show an effect only within color- management aware apps.

What I don't fully understand is the 'calibration' of a camera.

It's mainly setting the white balance, just as with a scanner (that upon being switched on, moves its sensor to a patch of white to properly white balance itself). Of course, the difference to a scanner is that you have to white balance every single shot as the illumination constantly changes.


Other than that, the camera, just like a scanner or printer, might perform some internal calibration routines when being switched on. For instance, you might argue that the sensor cleaning now often performed by cameras when being switched on is part of such an internal calibration.

Uli's work seems to be just concerned with 'profiling', not 'calibration'?

Yes. I never said anything else.

            Bye
                    Uli
________________________________________________________

  Uli Zappe, Solmsstraße 5, D-65189 Wiesbaden, Germany
  http://www.ritual.org
  Fon: +49-700-ULIZAPPE
  Fax: +49-700-ZAPPEFAX
________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Re: Media Testing for maclife.de (From: Eric Chan <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Media Testing for maclife.de (From: "edmund ronald" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Media Testing for maclife.de (From: "Bob Frost" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Media Testing for maclife.de
  • Next by Date: Re: Lightbooth Profile Building
  • Previous by thread: Re: Media Testing for maclife.de
  • Next by thread: Re: Media Testing for maclife.de
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread