Lists

Open Menu Close Menu

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: UGRA/UDACT-conforming displays [was: i1Display x i1Pro]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: UGRA/UDACT-conforming displays [was: i1Display x i1Pro]

Subject: Re: UGRA/UDACT-conforming displays [was: i1Display x i1Pro]
From: Klaus Karcher <email@hidden>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 14:11:44 +0200

Thomas Holm/pixl wrote:

[...] My experience tells me that you will see various degree of banding especially, in the two windows with a tone curve/gamma setting workspace which is different from your monitor calibration.


Thank you Thomas. I can confirm your findings.

BTW.: AFAIK the reason why basICColor replaced the L* response curve by CIECAM for the US market are patent issues. The curves are pretty much the same if one uses the corresponding viewing conditions for CIECAM. Maybe Karl can confirm this.

Klaus
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


Follow-Ups:

RE: UGRA/UDACT-conforming displays [was: i1Display x i1Pro]
From: Roger <email@hidden>


References:  
  >Re: UGRA/UDACT-conforming displays [was: i1Display x i1Pro] (From: Thomas Holm/pixl <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
Re: UGRA/UDACT-conforming displays [was: i1Display x i1Pro]

Next by Date:
RE: UGRA/UDACT-conforming displays [was: i1Display x i1Pro]

Previous by thread:
Re: UGRA/UDACT-conforming displays [was: i1Display x i1Pro]

Next by thread:
RE: UGRA/UDACT-conforming displays [was: i1Display x i1Pro]

Index(es):

Date
Thread