• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: proofing to match sheetfed uncoated
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: proofing to match sheetfed uncoated


  • Subject: Re: proofing to match sheetfed uncoated
  • From: Louis Dery <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:46:00 -0400

Hello Mike,

About your workflow, do you repurpose (CMTK to CMYK) job for Uncoated stock OR you simply apply a curve for uncoated dot gain you have?
Just want to understand what you mean about "contaminated inks" as they appear in the canned US Sheetfed Uncoated profile.
A profile made with a good GCR and lower ink coverage would help for a custom uncoated stock profile.


Take a look at the following link that may be of interest for you:

http://www.environmentalbychoice.com/papers_colour-profile.php

Louis Dery

On Apr 15, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Mike Stewart wrote:

Lately I have been working on an Indigo 5000; trying to make it a reliable
proofing machine. So far so good; especially when proofing to GRACoL
specs. It should be mentioned that we are also using a Creo Production
Flow RIP. Now that I have my sheetfed coated process where I want it; I'm
now looking to match an uncoated sheetfed press sheet. If I use the US
Sheetfed Uncoated profile and my Indigo profile I find that the resulting
proof is very muddy, dirty, etc. etc. Looking at the US Sheetfed Uncoated
profile I see that the CMYK colorants are somewhat muddy - is that where
my issue is? Maybe I need to create a profile that is not so muddy in the
first place. I know from doing press checks that an uncoated sheet will
print with dot gains ranging about 3 - 5 percent higher than a coated
sheet; but I really cannot see the inks being as contaminated as they
appear in the canned US Sheetfed Uncoated profile. I do, however, want to
stay within "Industry Standards". Any help would be appreciated. Mike
Stewart


_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40tglc.com


This email sent to email@hidden


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >proofing to match sheetfed uncoated (From: "Mike Stewart" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: proofing to match sheetfed uncoated
  • Next by Date: RE: proofing to match sheetfed uncoated
  • Previous by thread: proofing to match sheetfed uncoated
  • Next by thread: RE: proofing to match sheetfed uncoated
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread