RE: LaCie 324 vs HP LP2475w (was LaCie Blue Eye)
RE: LaCie 324 vs HP LP2475w (was LaCie Blue Eye)
- Subject: RE: LaCie 324 vs HP LP2475w (was LaCie Blue Eye)
- From: Roger <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2009 21:22:50 -0400
J. Raimar,
It is the OSD that gave me the impression that they were the same panels.
Vielen danke für der datei. On the specs alone, the HP "looks" better than
the LaCIE. Aber the LaCie sells for more money than the HP? It is
interesting.
MfG / Roger
> Roger,
>
> The HP2475w is an S-IPS with LM240WU4 panel from LG displays with 102%
> NTSC.
> The Lacie 324 is a S-PVA based unit with 92% LTM240SC06 panel with 92%
> from
> Samsung. That´s a big difference.
>
> 324 Gamut
>
> 1931 chromaticity
> Cx Cy
> R 0,659 0,327
> G 0,217 0,681
> B 0,147 0,073
>
> CIE 1931 area ratio coverage
> sRGB 130,98% 98,32%
> NTSC 92,77% 91,40%
> Adobe RGB 97,09% 95,16%
>
>
> Both units have internal LUTs (as always), but the Lacie allows you to
> adjust the luminance and whitepoint by software control (via DDC/ci).
> Here
> only the colortemperature for full white luminance is set. There is no
> full
> hardware calibration with all luminance levels given. That´s why the
> graphics card loads a VCGT/LUT with the "finetune". So what you do here
> is
> just a software based automatic OSD control - not more not less.
>
> The HP can adjust the internal scaler LUT via the OSD, too. The HP also
> supports DDC/ci. By using softmcs or a software that does "know" the
> HP, you
> can do the same type of calibration as with the lacie.....
>
> Raimar
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden