RE: Correct for a laminate finish
RE: Correct for a laminate finish
- Subject: RE: Correct for a laminate finish
- From: Roger <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:53:56 -0400
Thank's Terry and Derek,
I think the technique is starting to take shape in my head.
So, first, convert from GRACoL2006_C1 to LaminateProfile (relCol or
Perceptual). Then, proof the results using the regular GRACoL2006_C1 MX4
workflow. The proof will look ugly as hell but as long as the pressman hits
the proof, then, subsequently, when the sheet gets laminated, everything
will be hunky dory, right?
You guys are great -- I owe you a drink at the next CMS conference ;-)
Speaking of iCColor, using the GMG RIP on good-ole SemiMatte 250, this is
still the instrument that gives me the lowest deltaE average out of
iterating with either the Spectroscan, the iO table, the DTP70 and, possibly
the iSis.
BTW, would anyone know how to make the iSis XL swallow a standard random
ECI2002?
Roger
> Been there done THAT Roger!
>
> You need to make two profiles, one pre-laminate and the other post-
> laminate.
>
> The job gets separated via the post-laminate profile but you hand the
> pressman a proof done using the pre-laminate profile...looks ugly when
> they run it but as long as they match the proof, it should look just
> as you expect once the lamination is applies.
>
> Spent most of a weekend in a hotel with my iCColor a few years back
> running bunches of IT8 charts from pre/post-laminate press sheets that
> had about 3-4 different laminates applied. Lots of beer and room
> service that weekend!
>
> :-)
>
> Regards,
> Terry Wyse
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden