RE: Correct for a laminate finish
RE: Correct for a laminate finish
- Subject: RE: Correct for a laminate finish
- From: Rick Gordon <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:22:46 -0700
And for good measure, make your intentions clear in writing. "The proof looks bad by intention, because if you hit that, it will look good after lamination. Please match the proof, and don't 'compensate' to make the print output look 'better.' "
Rick Gordon
------------------
On 7/30/09 at 9:53 PM -0400, Roger wrote in a message entitled
"Re: Correct for a laminate finish":
>Thank's Terry and Derek,
>
>I think the technique is starting to take shape in my head.
>
>So, first, convert from GRACoL2006_C1 to LaminateProfile (relCol or
>Perceptual). Then, proof the results using the regular GRACoL2006_C1 MX4
>workflow. The proof will look ugly as hell but as long as the pressman hits
>the proof, then, subsequently, when the sheet gets laminated, everything
>will be hunky dory, right?
>
>You guys are great -- I owe you a drink at the next CMS conference ;-)
>
>Speaking of iCColor, using the GMG RIP on good-ole SemiMatte 250, this is
>still the instrument that gives me the lowest deltaE average out of
>iterating with either the Spectroscan, the iO table, the DTP70 and, possibly
>the iSis.
>
>BTW, would anyone know how to make the iSis XL swallow a standard random
>ECI2002?
--
___________________________________________________
RICK GORDON
EMERALD VALLEY GRAPHICS AND CONSULTING
___________________________________________________
WWW: http://www.shelterpub.com
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden