Re: Correct for a laminate finish
Re: Correct for a laminate finish
- Subject: Re: Correct for a laminate finish
- From: Jon Crook <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:31:18 -0500
- Thread-topic: Correct for a laminate finish
Keep in mind that when you do your G7 calibration on press you should figure
everything post lamination.
On 7/31/09 10:14 AM, "Scott Martin" <email@hidden> wrote:
> At the risk of repeating what others have said, measure your profiling
> target with and without the laminate, make profiles for both and then
> generate proofs for *both*. Present both to the pressman and have them
> match the unlamented proof and so that, once laminated, it will match
> the laminated proof. Seeing both will inspire confidence, be
> educational and keeps them "in the loop".
>
>> So, first, convert from GRACoL2006_C1 to LaminateProfile (relCol or
>> Perceptual). Then, proof the results using the regular GRACoL2006_C1
>> MX4
>> workflow.
>
> You'll essentially you'll be *assigning* the unlamented profile to the
> source file and converting to the inkjet space when printing for the
> unlamented proof. I'm sure you can figure this out - the exact
> logistics of how you chose to proof both with and without the laminate
> will vary per your workflow.
>
> Scott Martin
> www.on-sight.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
--
Jonathan Crook
Director of Color Management
Corporate Image
www.corp-image.com
800.247.8194
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden