Re: Color of a rose...
Re: Color of a rose...
- Subject: Re: Color of a rose...
- From: MARK SEGAL <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 06:29:57 -0700 (PDT)
When I was at Photoshop World in Boston a short while ago, I heard that to properly profile the newer wide-gamut displays one needs a more up-dated and capable colorimeter than what many of us may have been using in the past. I don't own it or need it, but one such example a technically knowledgeable vendor mentioned to me is the Spyder 3. From what I've seen there's no question that the gamut of the x900 Epson printers for example, using media such as Gold Fibre Silk, produces a gamut which can poke significantly beyond our display gamuts, depending on the hue.
Mark
________________________________
From: Terence Wyse <email@hidden>
To: 'colorsync-users?lists.apple.com' List <email@hidden>
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2009 8:30:36 AM
Subject: Re: Color of a rose...
On Jun 4, 2009, at 8:15 AM, Nipat Paiboonponpong wrote:
> As most experienced CMS users already know, a monitor's gamut is generally
> bigger than the printer's but that does not mean it can reproduce
> all colors of the printer, let alone human eyes.
Of course, it depends.....but I wouldn't even say that GENERALLY a monitor has a larger gamut than an inkjet printer as I've seen many of my own inkjet examples exceed AdobeRGB(1998) in most areas while I've yet to see a monitor profile fill that same space, even the supposedly "AdobeRGB" displays.
Regards,
Terry Wyse
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden