Re: Color of a rose...
Re: Color of a rose...
- Subject: Re: Color of a rose...
- From: Eric Chan <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 09:39:13 -0400
Hi Edmund,
If by "dropped on top of" you mean that the looks should be performed as
a separate step following the actual colorimetric transform, then that
is actually how it already works. There is initial (required) color
matrix, followed by an (optional) interpolated lookup table, followed by
an (optional) "look" table, followed by an (optional) tone curve -- the
last two can be used to provide a default "look" or rendering. If they
are omitted you'd still have the basic colorimetric transform. Just FYI.
Eric
edmund ronald wrote:
Here is the link to the visualisations of the Adobe hue shifts.
I really think that looks should be "dropped on top" of the actual
colorimetric transform; Adobe disagree, and everyone there is
certainly richer than me.
Edmund
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden