• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: BCP or no BCP to epson without rip
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: BCP or no BCP to epson without rip


  • Subject: Re: BCP or no BCP to epson without rip
  • From: G Mike Adams <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 09:25:07 -0500

Augusto,

Well, fact is you're going to continue to be confronted with contradictory opinions because that's pretty much what they are, opinions.

There isn't just one hard and fast rule on the subject. So in the end what's right is what works for you.

However, even though it isn't always entirely true, the way it's supposed to work is that BPC doesn't even work in perceptual, because the quickest, easiest, shorthand way to think about what it is and what it does is that it acts as perceptual rendering intent for the black channel only. Therefore in perceptual, since all the channels have been rendered using whatever perceptual formula has been applied, the black has as well. Since there are all different manner of profile- making engines out there, and many of them have all different manner of tweaks and sliders and curves for perceptual, and there are all different sophistication levels of people making profiles, your mileage may vary a bit, but that is the way it's supposed to work.


Regards, Mike Adams correctcolor.org



On Jun 9, 2009, at 5:26 AM, Augusto wrote:

Printing to Epson is probably the most popular way for photographers to
squeeze the best of their pictures to paper and although I have been using
this workflow for some time I still find contradictory opinions on this BPC
matter.


With a relative colorimetric intent, there is a more unanimous acceptance
that BPC "on" is the way to go and even the recommended intent if the image
gamut fits in the destination profile gamut.


With perceptual, I am confronted with a more ambiguous knowledge. I find
very respected people recommending their profiles to be used with BPC "off"
and no less respected people saying that BPC should always be "on" with
profile conversion cause even if it does no good it will not harm.


I would like to "nail" ( if possible) once for all, this workflow and I
would very much appreciate your knowledge on this question.




Augusto



_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >BCP or no BCP to epson without rip (From: "Augusto" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Color of a rose...
  • Next by Date: Re: BCP or no BCP to epson without rip
  • Previous by thread: Re: BCP or no BCP to epson without rip
  • Next by thread: Re: BCP or no BCP to epson without rip
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread