Re: DTP41's
Re: DTP41's
- Subject: Re: DTP41's
- From: Koch Karl <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 09:04:15 +0100
Hi Roger,
I'm going to try to dig my old DTP41 notes and documentation but, in
the
meantime, could anyone help shed some light on this practice? I have
a class
coming up where I'd really like to put this second unit to good use
with my
students.
sorry for not answering your question, but you touched a subject here
that bothers me since the first time, I followed this thread:
Calibration.
If you measure in transmissive mode, you need to calibrate to your
(known) light source! This I can´t see anywhere in this approach. That
´s why I agree with Graeme:
Far better is to measure the system as is, by measuring the emission
value rather than transmission (hence the idea of reading strips in
emission mode I referred to in a previous post).
ie. you treat the whole system like it was an emissive display.
And if we take measuring emissision into account and allow for that as
a kind of transmissive strip reading with the i1 pro, then I think I
can enter the competition: basICColor catch was probably the first
software that could do that – I think it was back in 2003 or so ;-)
Best regards,
Karl Koch _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden