• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Re: i1Display x i1Pro
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: i1Display x i1Pro


  • Subject: Re: Re: i1Display x i1Pro
  • From: "dpascale" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:47:29 -0400

Martin,

I do not think you are missing something.

I agree with you that the procedure mentioned by Eric is a process conformance result, which is excellent, by any means. Offering a validating software myself, I would only be careful of not using the same software that made the calibration for validating ;-)
One of the rationales for using another software is that if you validate with colors that were used for profiling, there is a better chance of a better fit at those point in comparison with other randomly selected values.


However, whatever the validating result is, and whatever the software used to measure it comes from, the average tolerance values have to be taken as "relative" to the accuracy of the instrument, and the difference between instruments can be significantly higher.

Eric mentioned he did not have a comparison between the i1 Display and the i1 Pro; it would be interesting to see the process validation numbers for the same setups using the i1 Pro (by same setup: same computers, monitors, OS, profiling program) since they have enough data for good stats. Ufortunately, this is quite a task to profile so many displays.

Danny Pascale

email@hidden

www.babelcolor.com

----- Original Message ----- From: "Martin Weberg" <email@hidden>
To: "eric@poem" <email@hidden>
Cc: <email@hidden>
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 8:09 AM
Subject: Re: Re: i1Display x i1Pro



Hi Eric and all,

Talking about validation, is the validation done using the same
instrument? If so, I can't see how this validates the instrument. For
sure the conversion process but not the instrument. Am I missing
something?

Martin Weberg



2009/3/26 eric@poem <email@hidden>:
Hi Marco,

I'm not sure if this is completely on topic as I don't have a comparison
between i1 Displays and i1's. But in a large publishers here in the UK I set
them up with Eye One Match and i1Displays, running Apple Cinema Displays
mostly 20" and number of 23". Most of the 20" validate .3-.4 dE average,
with the 23" coming in around .5dE. And that is 280 displays calibrating
every 4 weeks.


_______________________________________________

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >Re: Re: i1Display x i1Pro (From: "eric@poem" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Re: i1Display x i1Pro (From: Martin Weberg <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: i1Display x i1Pro
  • Next by Date: Re: Re: i1Display x i1Pro
  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: i1Display x i1Pro
  • Next by thread: Re: i1Display x i1Pro
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread