Re: UGRA/UDACT-conforming displays [was: i1Display x i1Pro]
Re: UGRA/UDACT-conforming displays [was: i1Display x i1Pro]
- Subject: Re: UGRA/UDACT-conforming displays [was: i1Display x i1Pro]
- From: Eric Nunn <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:34:13 +0000
Hi Roger,
Thanks for the link, as I understand it the Swop certification is a
laboratory based analysis of a product range linked to a soft proofing
system like Dialog or Remote Director.
Whilst I feel that the ACD's are perfectly fit for purpose they appear
unable to conform to the numbers for the UDACT certification on an
individual basis, Ugra are very clear on what is and isn't acceptable
for soft proofing, Gamma 2.2 for instance is ruled out in favour of
L*. D50 whitepoint and a minimum luminance of 120cd/m2. Which means
for conformance we will have to use a calibration software such as
ColorEyes or basiCColor that provides L* settings.
And no, the yummy figures are not UDACT, I was referring to the
validation score through the Monitor validation tool in i1Match.
On 28 Mar 2009, at 13:42, Roger wrote:
Eric,
I realise that the ACD are dumbed down displays and do not have the
hardware to be considered candidates for certified softproofing.
The ACD are still SWOP-certified, you know, according to this page:
http://www.swop.org/certification/monitorlist.asp
I do find them to be consistent down to the .3./.4dE level
Through UDACT tests? Just curious. These seem awfully yummy figures.
Roger
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden