• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 264
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 264


  • Subject: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 6, Issue 264
  • From: Mike Strickler <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:01:33 -0700



Yes, it is bad software. You need Link Profiler or Link-o-Later, not Monaco, and not Profilemaker's DL module. There IS a huge difference.


Mike Strickler
MSP Graphic Services

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:28:31 -0400
From: Kevin Muldoon <email@hidden>
Subject: Device Link Profiles & Monaco Profiler Platinum
To: colorsync-users <email@hidden>
Message-ID: <email@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed

I had my first experience creating a device link profile (henceforth,
DVL) and I wasn't too thrilled with the result. Hope you guys can
help improve the situation. Here's the stats....

ICC: Monaco Profiler Platinum 4.8
Target:IT8.7/4
Proofer: Kodak Approval XP2, D3332 Media set
Press: SWOP2006Coated3v2 (From IDEA Alliance)
RIP: Nexus
Control: IDEAlliance ISO 12647-7 Digital Control Strip 2009

Result: 33 patches of control strip > DeltaE 2. Far worse than the 10
patches out that Kodak's downloadable DVL currently gives us.

Obviously, Monaco is not the correct choice for DVL creation since
the black channel is not excluded from transformations. However, I
would have  expected a closer colormetric match or at least closer
than the default DVL provided by Kodak.

I sent target to the Kodak Approval XP2 with D3332 Media, being sure
to remove any CM. I measured the output to verify my TVI and
densities were within the Application Data Sheet Specs. I created
the .icc with medium K generation and 300TAC, maxing the K at 95%.
Once profile was created, I linked it with the SWOP2006Coated3v2.icc,
this time choosing 100K on max black. I plugged in DVL, sent a proof
and viola! 33 patches out.

Did I do something horribly wrong or should I simply point my finger
menacingly at Monaco and say "Bad Profiling Software!"

Thanks for the help guys. This one is gonna keep me up at night.


-- Kevin Muldoon


_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Prev by Date: Re: Device Link Profiles & Monaco Profiler Platinum
  • Next by Date: Snow Leopard notes, FWIW
  • Previous by thread: Re: Device Link Profiles & Monaco Profiler Platinum
  • Next by thread: Snow Leopard notes, FWIW
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread