• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Printing profile test targets WITHOUT photoshop
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Printing profile test targets WITHOUT photoshop


  • Subject: Re: Printing profile test targets WITHOUT photoshop
  • From: James Horne <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:37:14 +1000
  • Thread-topic: Printing profile test targets WITHOUT photoshop

Hi Folks

I ran with the suggestion that Preview should not affect the colours of the
output print target as long as I did not formally convert the colour profile
of the untagged image.  I basically asked a chap who runs a profiling
service to try printing the same target from Preview and from CS3 and then
compare the scans with his profiling hardware.  Unfortunately there is a
measurable difference between them. I don't know what exactly Preview is
doing but on the strength of this test it looks like I cannot use it for
printing profile targets.

Cheers

James

On 19/8/09 9:44 PM, "James Horne" <email@hidden> wrote:

> I had a little play with Klaus suggestion.  I can configure the printer driver
> through CUPS with an appropriate media selection for the paper I wish to
> profile and colour management (or lack of) settings.  I wasn't sure if it was
> suggested in fun or not but part of the solution seems sensible, to me at
> least. I wonder though what happens in the conversion to postscript in
> tiff2ps, presumably using libtiff, to rendering of colours.  I might print my
> colour test chart out that way and again through my current method with
> Preview and see if there is any colour shift.  If there is none it would
> probably confirm both methods are leaving the colour alone but if there was a
> difference it wouldn't tell me which method was changing it, only that there
> was a difference.
>
> Anyway, the immediate annoyance with submitting the tiff2ps postscript output
> was that it printed in portrait orientation and went off the edges of the
> paper and AFAIK one can only manage a 180 degree rotation.  I had a play with
> Imagemagick "convert" function to achieve the same but there are different
> issues with scaling.  My profiling service insists the colour charts do not
> get scaled, just 100% size centred on an A4 page.  They don't really suggest
> converting to postscript either..........but hey you only live once!
>
> I'll probably have a little more play with the postscript conversion, at least
> until somebody wiser tells me I'm being a fool!
>
> Cheers
>
> J
>
>
> On 19/8/09 6:19 PM, "Graeme Gill" <email@hidden> wrote:
>
>> edmund ronald wrote:
>>> I can't be bothered to look at the Generic RGB Apple Profile, and I'm
>>> too dumb to figure out what is in a profile anyway - but maybe some of
>>> our tech geniuses here can tell us what it is, or just make us a
>>> genuine "do nothing" profile of some sort to act as a placeholder ?
>>
>> It doesn't work like that. The only type of real device profile
>> that will "do nothing" is the same profile that will be used
>> as the destination, the very (fragile) system that is now
>> (it seems) not working so reliably.
>>
>> You can make a device link "do nothing" profile, but this isn't
>> going to be a valid way of tagging an image made of device values.
>>
>> The correct, robust method is to tag the image with a flag
>> that says "Image is in output device space, do not color manage",
>> but unless someone like the ICC comes up with a standard that
>> uses the ICC format for such a thing (a meta profile), it is
>> still going to be printing system or operating system
>> and print file format dependent.
>>
>> [ If it were up to me there would be two flags:
>>      Do not color transform.
>>      Do not use calibration.
>>    So that there was a way of tagging calibration system and
>>    profiling test charts in a way that guarantees that they
>>    are printed properly. That's what we did with Postscript
>>    comments on the DICENet/Cyclone, and it worked very reliably.]
>>
>> Graeme Gill.
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>
.
>> au
>>
>> This email sent to email@hidden


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Prev by Date: Re: PDF Color Space
  • Next by Date: Re: Printing profile test targets WITHOUT photoshop
  • Previous by thread: Re: PDF Color Space
  • Next by thread: Re: Printing profile test targets WITHOUT photoshop
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread