Re: The need for a substantial upgrade of ColorSync
Re: The need for a substantial upgrade of ColorSync
- Subject: Re: The need for a substantial upgrade of ColorSync
- From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2010 22:53:37 -0700
- Thread-topic: The need for a substantial upgrade of ColorSync
In a message dated 4/3/10 10:41 PM, Walker Blackwell wrote:
> Actually, for me, it's not as much that I want ColorSync to upgrade, but stay
> working correctly with Epson and Adobe.
That's understandable, but I was really trying to start a discussion about
something beyond that. But it seems that we are going back yet again to the
usual litany of narrowly-focused woes.
Which are probably best addressed in a separate thread.
> Because everyone uses Adobe and many many use Apple and many many use Epson,
> that printing path needs to remain sacrosanct. Killing (unwittingly or
> wittingly) a printing path just because an application (in this case CS3) is a
> couple of years old, is total BS in my opinion.
Fine. Other threads are probably more appropriate for that conversation.
Can we please go back to talking about whether or not, in other people's
opinion, ColorSync is now increasingly losing step with new possibilities?
Marco Ugolini
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden