Re: The need for a substantial upgrade of ColorSync
Re: The need for a substantial upgrade of ColorSync
- Subject: Re: The need for a substantial upgrade of ColorSync
- From: Walker Blackwell <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 08:35:27 -0400
You are most likely correct here Bob. I will stop at this point.
Walker
On Apr 4, 2010, at 5:46 AM, Bob Frost wrote:
>> Because everyone uses Adobe and many many use Apple and many many use Epson, that printing path needs to remain sacrosanct.
> ..............................................
>
> Unfortunately although most people do use Adobe programs, many don't use Apple, and many don't use Epsons, and many don't use Canons (that you mentioned earlier). So Adobe has to try and keep all the lines going to and from about 300 models of cameras from many different manufacturers, a dozen or so variations of Mac and Windows OSs, and printers galore from Epson, HP, Canon, etc,! An impossible task, IME.
>
> Everyone thinks their particular setup and workflow should be sacrosanct! What's the old saying "you've got to go with the flow"?
>
> Bob frost.
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Walker Blackwell" <email@hidden>
>
Walker Blackwell
802.821.4451
www.walkerblackwell.com
aim: greendirtblues
email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden