Re: The need for a substantial upgrade of ColorSync
Re: The need for a substantial upgrade of ColorSync
- Subject: Re: The need for a substantial upgrade of ColorSync
- From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 14:15:33 -0400 (EDT)
Bob Frost wrote:
>> or the fact that VISTA was a flop.
>
>What a great flop!! It's sold at least 6 times as many as Snow Leopard, and
>goes from strength to strength in it's latest marketing guise - Win7. ;)
>
>Come on, let's have some common sense in this. I read this list to learn
>about Macs, their good points and bad, not to bash them or to listen to
>people bashing Windows.
And I'm not interested in people distorting the meaning of wehat I wrote just to score cheap points.
I wrote what I wrote to say that WCS was part of VISTA, and that VISTA was "retired" by Microsoft. Are you disputing THAT too?
All you get from my message is that I'm "bashing Microsoft"?
Is this a bad joke of some kind? Am I wasting my time writing to this forum, since most of what I get in return is either unrelated chatter or distortions?
>Perhaps Apple has got something going behind the scenes to improve CM
>generally, but I would have thought that the days are past when one small
>(?) computer company can dictate to the mass of vested interests in CM. I
>found it interesting that it was Canon who teamed up with MS to produce the
>WCS scheme. And we musn't forget that it was Linotype-Hell who produced the
>CMM that is the guts of both Colorsync on the Macs and ICM1/2/3 on Windows.
So what? What does that have to do with the topic of the thread I initiated?
>Who know where the next big advances will come from?
It seems certain that it won't come from this thread. Most respondents can't even stick to the subject.
Marco
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden