Re: The need for a substantial upgrade of ColorSync
Re: The need for a substantial upgrade of ColorSync
- Subject: Re: The need for a substantial upgrade of ColorSync
- From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 16:17:49 -0600
On Apr 5, 2010, at 3:33 PM, Martin Orpen wrote:
> If you knew what you were talking about you'd most likely be able to spell Cocoa and get the order right...
I just quoted the article of which apparently you didn’t read. Take it up with the original author.
> But then you were also the person who wrote a whole Adobe White Paper using the term "RAW" and then had the gall to criticise others for using it on this list!
Yup although checking the original, the term WAS correctly formatted, but I will take the heat (if that’s all you got) for not checking what got published to the web page.
> Unlike you, I actually have to buy multiple copies of Adobe's products.
What makes you so damn sure of your made up facts (again)?
> Maybe I'd be a bit more respectful if the people they used to boost their products on an Apple list had a clue what Carbon and Cocoa were?
Take it up with Mr. Shankland. Unlike you, I don’t make up the news and the facts, I only report them. Apparently spelling and characterization is all you’ve got to dismiss your misunderstanding of why Mac users didn’t get 64 bit Photoshop when Windows users did, despite well known historical facts in that 2008 article.
Now that you’ve gone on record here again acting foolish, maybe we CAN get back to topic.
Andrew Rodney
http://www.digitaldog.net/ _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden