Re: GRACol: Very surprised at how c100 m100 is displayed...
Re: GRACol: Very surprised at how c100 m100 is displayed...
- Subject: Re: GRACol: Very surprised at how c100 m100 is displayed...
- From: "Pylant, Brian" <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:21:12 -0400
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- Thread-topic: GRACol: Very surprised at how c100 m100 is displayed...
> All I can tell you is that the "official" GRACoL Coated1 profile that you can
> download from the IDEAlliance web site is a very good one.
That's the one I've been playing with... I have no doubt it's not actually a
flawed profile, I didn't mean to imply otherwise. I just question whether
c100 m100 can actually produce the blue I'm seeing on-screen on press...
certainly not on ours.
I generally try to keep magenta at 75% or less of the cyan value to ensure a
result that most viewers would call "blue." Anything higher and the result
seems to be what most folks would deem purple. (Or at least purple-ish... I
hate referring to colors by name!)
We admittedly have enough trouble maintaining a consistent blue/purple
balance as the M value approaches and passes the 75-80% threshold, so I'm
afraid to try to use GRACoL 2006 as our standard as I worry we'll be sending
seps into the pressroom that are too hot on the M plate.
Brian
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden