Re: Epson 4900 Calibration
Re: Epson 4900 Calibration
- Subject: Re: Epson 4900 Calibration
- From: José Ángel Bueno García <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 00:38:36 +0200
El día 4 de abril de 2011 23:39, Terence Wyse <email@hidden> escribió:
>
> On Apr 4, 2011, at 2:58 PM, José Ángel Bueno García wrote:
>
>> And don´t you, Terence and Roger, see or make any difference between
>> proof and inkjet print for exhibition?
>
> Yes...two different applications, possibly different requirements...but like Mike Strickler said, I too believe proofing is the more critical in terms of color-matching since we're generally matching to a verifiable international or regional "standard" or specification.....and we're doing it to within *tenths* of a delta e tolerance. Fine art printing rarely if ever is held to a standard other than possibly an internal standard.
>
> Terry
Well, I'm talking about reproducing art of a piece of art that has to
be replaced to be restored, or scanning for the dissemination of
photographic archives are likely to be printed.
Inkjet printings in museum are associated with patches that suffer the
same lighting conditions, temperature and relative humidity so that at
a given De are replaced by reprinting.
So as you say... two different aplications.
Go to sleep. 23:45 local time (GMT -1)
Jose
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden