RE: UV cut or not for i1 Photo Pro
RE: UV cut or not for i1 Photo Pro
- Subject: RE: UV cut or not for i1 Photo Pro
- From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:31:34 -0400
I never use UV-cut.
/ Roger
-----Original Message-----
From: colorsync-users-bounces+graxx=email@hidden
[mailto:colorsync-users-bounces+graxx=email@hidden] On
Behalf Of David Scharf
Sent: April-12-11 7:44 PM
To: Tom Lianza
Cc: colorsync-users
Subject: Re: UV cut or not for i1 Photo Pro
Hi Tom,
I thought that the regular i1 used M1 illumination, not M0. Was that wrong?
Only 2 people on the list have replied with definite reasons and opinions
for UV cut or not in a spectrophotometer for print profiling. I wonder how
everyone else makes their decision for which instrument they will buy.
Regards,
David
*
*
Scanning Electron Microscopy
Los Angeles, CA 90039
http://www.scharfphoto.com
http://www.electronmicro.com
On 4/12/11 6:59 AM, Tom Lianza wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> You are asking a very good question here. If I had to make a
> recommendation for making profiles on papers with OBA, I personally would
not use UV cut.
> I was just looking at some output based upon profiles generated from
> press samples with high OBA content using M0 and M2(UV cut). There
> were definite differences, but they were fairly small. Using our
> killer flesh tone, shadow detail target, I thought that the flesh
> tones were more pleasing using M0. If you use the UV cut in generating
> a profile, your highlights may get a bit cool when viewed in UV rich
> environment. If you look at the M0 output with no UV it appears a bit
> warmer, but that is the better error direction in my opinion. I'm
> sure that there will be some that disagree with me on this issue.
>
> Regards,
> Tom Lianza
>
>
> On 4/12/11 8:21 AM, "David Scharf"<email@hidden> wrote:
>
>> *DAVID SCHARF PHOTOGRAPHY*
>>
>> Scanning Electron Microscopy
>>
>> Los Angeles, CA 90039
>>
>> http://www.scharfphoto.com
>>
>> http://www.electronmicro.com
>>
>>
>> On 4/12/11 4:54 AM, David Scharf wrote:
>>> I'm not quite sure which spectro to get: UV cut or not? Does the new
>>> i1 Photo Pro compensate for optical brighteners in software? I do
>>> use some papers with optical brighteners. Just got an Epson 7890. My
>>> viewing lights are florescent D50, so I'm sure that they have some
>>> UV content. Can I get some suggestions to help me decide.
>> I should have mentioned that my primary use will be for making print
>> profiles. If the software compensates for brighteners, is there any
>> good reason to get a UV cut model?
>>> Thank you all. Best regards.
>>>
>>> David
>> _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>> e.com
>>
>> This email sent to email@hidden
>
> The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying attachments
may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise
protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this
message, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please
immediately alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message
and any attachments. Any dissemination, distribution or other use of the
contents of this message by anyone other than the intended recipient is
strictly prohibited. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused
by any virus transmitted by this email or any attachments.
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden