RE: iSis was Re: Any comments or feedback on i!Publish? (Lou Dina)
RE: iSis was Re: Any comments or feedback on i!Publish? (Lou Dina)
- Subject: RE: iSis was Re: Any comments or feedback on i!Publish? (Lou Dina)
- From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 15:26:09 -0400
This is a phenomenon I can attest to. Not ideal :(
Roger
-----Original Message-----
From: colorsync-users-bounces+graxx=email@hidden
[mailto:colorsync-users-bounces+graxx=email@hidden] On
Behalf Of Tyler Boley
Sent: May-18-11 3:22 PM
To: Terence Wyse
Cc: 'colorsync-users?lists.apple.com' List
Subject: iSis was Re: Any comments or feedback on i!Publish? (Lou Dina)
regarding the iSis, I'm finding with inkjet coated fine art papers, the
usual suspects, that the rubber drive washers pick up (well dried) black ink
from the black start bar and proceed to put it down in slight amounts on the
lower color patches. With very light colors this clearly taints the result,
with repeated measurement for averaging it's clearly seen, the later
measurements differing from the 1st, progressively worse. Anyone find this
problematic? I doubt my averaged data is more reliable than the first pass
in the light patches.
This leads me to my second question. If these instruments make multiple
samples per patch and average them on the fly, other than some gross
alignment error what is the point of multiple chart measurement for
averaging if there has been significant averaging with one pass anyway?
Tyler
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden