I don't know....I've got both and still prefer the iSis. It's less fussy about media types (canvas...no problem), chart bar coding is cool, has a much better paper path (flat) and just seems to be better built.....but I do miss the speed and single-pass UVi measurements and wish it had the option of white/black backing of the DTP70.
Terry
On May 18, 2011, at 1:28 PM, Roger Breton wrote:
I'd wish they'd revive the DTP70 :(
Roger
-----Original Message-----
From: colorsync-users-bounces+graxx=email@hidden
[mailto:colorsync-users-bounces+graxx=email@hidden] On
Behalf Of Scott Martin
Sent: May-18-11 10:57 AM
To: 'colorsync-users?lists.apple.com' List
Subject: Re: Any comments or feedback on i!Publish? (Lou Dina)
On May 17, 2011, at 2:09 PM, edmund ronald wrote:
I don't see anyone swapping a DTP70 for an iSis only so as to be able to
transition from Monaco Profiler to this snazzy new thing called i1Profiler.
And with ColorPort there's no need to. In fact, you might even prefer the
increased productivity of measuring in CP while simultaneously generating
profiles in i1P. That combined with single scan UVin measurement, and the
ability to put a lot of patches on one page with minimal headers and footers
make the DTP70 an attractive solution, IMO.
Scott Martin
www.on-sight.com
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden