Re: i1Profiler & SpectroProofer Data [subject corrected]
Re: i1Profiler & SpectroProofer Data [subject corrected]
- Subject: Re: i1Profiler & SpectroProofer Data [subject corrected]
- From: Scott Martin <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 15:35:12 -0500
On Sep 14, 2012, at 12:54 PM, Martin Orpen wrote:
> Controls with sliders that use arbitrary units with no documentation to let me know what to expect from applying x units of contrast, saturation, neutralisation and smoothness are a nightmare. I'd love to spend all day wasting media carrying out tests but I've got deadlines to meet (and a family to feed).
I have spent many, many days performing exhaustive tests with these and other sliders on a variety of printing processes. Doing so, and having an advanced understanding of these and other profiling specifics helps distinguish myself and my services as a notch above the rest. It's part of becoming a professional. I don't see how having a different unit of measurement would have changed my process or understanding. You have to see the real world test results.
The Perceptual rendering controls you mention are nothing new. They are unchanged and have been around for over a decade in previous versions of Profiler (aka Monaco Profiler).
This silly emotional banter isn't constructive. XRite already has a forum where these things have been discussed for years. I'd suggest getting over this and move on. Or at least, let us move on.
Scott Martin
www.on-sight.com
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden