Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 10, Issue 166
Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 10, Issue 166
- Subject: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 10, Issue 166
- From: "Millers' Photography L.L.C." <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2013 11:41:48 -0700
Roger,
I want to add, the Epson Pro 9600 with MK, could not render or, if you will, express, the colors on Arches Cold Press watercolor paper 140 gsm, as does the Epson Pro 9900. What a tremendous difference. 9900 is nearly miraculous. Just my humble opinion.
With the 9900 I have only used MK.
Warm Regards,
David
On Aug 3, 2013, at 5:47 AM, Roger Breton <email@hidden> wrote:
> David,
>
> I know some people who have waste their time trying to outperform SOME canned profiles. HP comes to mind.
> It's a complicated issue to be sure. It depends on a lot of factors. With some printers and some media and some drivers, I've seen canned profiles way outperform custom profiling.
>
> HP has really done some profiles right. Beats the shit of all my tools and instruments...
>
> Kindly / Roger
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: colorsync-users-bounces+graxx=email@hidden [mailto:colorsync-users-bounces+graxx=email@hidden] On Behalf Of Millers' Photography L.L.C.
> Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2013 10:37 PM
> To: email@hidden List; Neil Steinberg
> Subject: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 10, Issue 166
>
> Hi Neil.
>
> I don't think what I am writing is part of your issue. I use custom .icc profiles I create on my own. I refuse to use
> canned profiles!
>
> Cheers
>
> David B. Miller
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden