Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 10, Issue 166
Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 10, Issue 166
- Subject: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 10, Issue 166
- From: Martin Orpen <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2013 21:26:35 +0100
On 3 Aug 2013, at 19:41, "Millers' Photography L.L.C." <email@hidden> wrote:
> What a tremendous difference. 9900 is nearly miraculous.
It is an incredible printing deviceā¦
Until you compare prints that you may have made on an Epson 10000 a decade ago and you realise that the Ultrachrome MK ink is a major step backwards in print quality.
There is no *comparison* in fact.
Any print that relies for its impact on dense, velvet blacks would look better printed on Epson's ancient ink jet tech than on any of its current range.
--
Martin Orpen
Idea Digital Imaging Ltd
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden